The Halliburton Riddle

“We know what the meaning of i$, i$ to Halliburton. It is by far the largest beneficiary of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. With no-bid, no-ceiling contracts, the company has already amassed $2 billion in work. It is doing everything from restoring oil facilities to providing toilets for troops. A year ago Halliburton was staring at nearly a half-billion dollars in losses. In the second quarter of 2003 it posted a profit of $26 million.”

—Derrick Z. Jackson, “Cheney’s Conflict with the Truth,”  

The Boston Globe (September 19, 2003)

“I’ve severed all my ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interests. I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind and haven't had now for over three years.”   —Vice President Dick Cheney, on NBC’s Meet the Press, September 14, 2003

Manifest Destiny

In today’s fast-paced, constantly-changing world, members of the working class—especially those in America where vacation/holiday time is extremely limited, find it increasingly more difficult to maintain regular contact with old friends and extended family members. To be able to spend time with the same group of friends at least once or twice every year is almost unheard of. Vice President Dick Cheney, in spite of his rigorous schedule, however, has been able to maintain a relationship with the owners of the Armstrong Ranch in South Texas, for more than thirty years and “sometimes hunts there several times a year.”[1] 

Such a relationship cries out for more scrutiny than it has been given in the press so far.  Cheney’s “peppering” of Texas attorney Harry Whittington with gunshot is not notable in and of itself; it is the frequency with which such hunting trips have taken place that piques the imagination. The ranch where the shooting occurred is owned by the family of Anne L. Armstrong, a former director on the board of Halliburton for twenty-three years (1977-2000), serving not only as a high-level corporate committee member on the management oversight committee and the corporate governance committee, but, in particular, on the very nominating committee which in 1995 chose Dick Cheney as its president and eventually as Halliburton’s chairman. 

Cheney has denied any persisting ties with his former employer—the same corporation which has reaped massive profits from the Bush-Cheney debacle in Iraq—leaving us to speculate what it is that entices such an inept hunter back to that ranch year after year.  The failure of Cheney and his hosts to notify the proper authorities for more than twenty-four hours after the shooting further incites an inquisitive mind to inquire whether other persons with longstanding relationships to Halliburton and the Vice President were allowed to skulk away, undetected by law enforcement or members of the press.

The Armstrong Ranch has been called “kind of a rite of passage for Texas Republicans. You go pay homage.”[2] That statement contains overtones of an obeisance required, yet undefined. The suggestion that the Armstrong family has a long Republican tradition must be viewed in light of Texas’ short history of voting Republican—a tide which did not even begin to turn until Texas elected its first Republican U.S. Senator (John Tower) in 1961 and its first Republican governor (Bill Clements) in 1978. Nevertheless, the process by which Texans wormed their way into the Republican power structure deserves our attention. That power shift occurred at the same point in time that destiny brought together Donald Rumsfeld, Richard B. Cheney and Anne L. Armstrong.  Destiny embodied in the form of Richard M. Nixon…and made manifest in the person of John B. Connally, Jr.

Economic Opportunities

Donald Rumsfeld was the first of the trio to receive a bid into the Nixon White House—an invitation which resulted from Nixon’s approval of the way Rumsfeld handled a political confrontation with a program touted by Democrats in August of 1966. As a young Republican Congressman from Illinois, Rumsfeld had launched a vicious series of attacks upon a project called “Mohole,” viewed by him as a boondoggle for President Lyndon Johnson’s long-time supporter, Brown & Root. So successful was Rumsfeld’s attack that what Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson a “purely non-political project”—designed by the National Science Foundation to learn the cause of earthquakes and volcanoes—was terminated, notwithstanding the fact that Brown & Root continued to be awarded much more lucrative military contracts in Vietnam.  

Pearson and Anderson accused Rumsfeld of having attacked the wrong Brown & Root contract, of having missed the real story—“that Brown and Root have been financing Lyndon Johnson for years, put up around $100,000 for him when he was running as a young Congressman from Texas. And today the defense contracts they have been getting from the Government are far greater than the piddling $19.7 million which the House last week lopped off the Mohole project…”[3]

One week before Mohole was axed, Congress had authorized spending of almost half a billion dollars “for military construction money [for Vietnam], of which Brown and Root will get a substantial share.”[4] Almost as an afterthought the columnists added: “Brown and Root also prospered under President Eisenhower. They were given a large slice of the contract to build military bases in Spain at a cost of around $2 billion. The George Brown family at that time was contributing not to Mr. Eisenhower but to the Democrats.”[5] 

That’s nice work, if you can get it. 

Two years later Richard Nixon had replaced Lyndon Johnson in the White House, and he remembered Rumseld’s performance. He wanted that young man on his team and offered him a job in his administration—at the very bottom rung, the Office of Economic Opportunity. Rumsfeld quickly accepted. At his first opportunity Rumsfeld called in a young legislative aide with whom he had crossed paths—Dick Cheney. It boggles the mind even to attempt to visualize these two men working to expand economic opportunity for the impoverished; social workers they are not. Both were, however, extremely hard-working and ambitious and did not remain long in the cellar. Late in 1970 Rumsfeld also took on the added assignment of White House Counselor and would ultimately be replaced at OEO by another of today’s military-industrialists, Frank Carlucci of the Carlyle Group. 

One year later, Rumsfeld was named Director of the Cost of Living Council, a new position created under the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, and he brought Cheney over as his deputy. The importance of the Cost of Living Council at that particular time cannot be over-emphasized.  Before we had a war on drugs or a war on terror, we were fighting a war against inflation.  As the end of the war in Vietnam was approaching, the looming fear was that America would not be able to sell enough products overseas to compensate for its increasingly insatiable demand from foreign sellers.  Bankruptcy thus haunted the Nixon Administration in 1970 and 1971, much as it had Grover Cleveland’s presidency in the 1890’s. 

When John Connally took control of the Treasury Department in February 1971 after the resignation of Secretary David M. Kennedy of Chicago, the picture was bleak.[6] In 1973 Connally told a group of Canadians in Toronto:

By the middle of 1971 the American trade balance was in rapid decline. Moreover, we could no longer maintain the fiction that the dollar was convertible into gold when in fact those dollars increased to a ratio of six to one over our gold reserves during the 1960s and the 1970s. We had simply expended our surplus and extended our credit until both were exhausted. The American image of invulnerability was clearly a delusion. It was again demonstrated that no nation is so large and so powerful that it is invulnerable to change.[7]

Closing the gold window

Connally’s selection by Nixon was a curious choice. He was still a Democrat at that time and had no obvious ties to anyone in the Nixon White House. Perhaps he had been hand-picked by Nixon’s former New York law firm—Mudge, Rose—which represented Paribas, a 19th-century offshoot of the Rothschild-controlled Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas. Connally, an attorney, was a partner in the Houston law firm of Vinson & Elkins, whose senior partner, James A. Elkins, Jr., had inherited a large block of stock in the First City National Bank of Houston—for which Connally served as a director. A 1976 Congressional investigation would subsequently reveal that the large Houston bank had partnered with numerous Rothschild-affiliated banks in joint ventures such as Rothschild Intercontinental Bank, Ltd. of London and New Court Securities Corp. of New York.[8] The Washington Post reported in 1969 that the Rothschilds were “rebuilding their international financial empire through the Five Arrows Group … composed of London’s N.M. Rothschild, Baron Guy’s Paris Rothschild bank, Cousin Edmond’s Geneva-based Banque Privee, the Banque Lambert of Brussels, in which the Rothschilds have a substantial minority stake, and Pierson, Heldring and Pierson, an independent Dutch bank long associated with the family.”[9]

Early in 1969 Connally had also been elected to Halliburton’s board, and he would be “re-elected” in November 1972 after having served seventeen months as Secretary of the Treasury.[10] Halliburton had also been a client of Vinson & Elkins, and it would remain so until 2002 when the corporation moved its business to Houston rival firm, Baker & Botts, the law firm headed by Bush friend James A. Baker III. Connally’s gigantic challenge during his short term of office was to “close the gold window,” thus ending the United States’ legal obligation to exchange dollars held by foreign banks for gold. 

Connally was neither a banker nor an economist, and he was never a wealthy man—compared to the Vanderbilts, Whitneys and the like. But he was a lawyer for wealthy and powerful men, among whom he circulated his entire life—whose names remain shrouded in secrecy behind corporate facades.  Connally’s underlings in the Nixon administration—Rumsfeld and Cheney—also rose from economic stations that would be termed, at most, middle class, neither of them ever having achieved any degree of education, accomplishment, or even competence that would justify the arrogance each has exhibited in the last decade. The Cost of Living Council in which Rumsfeld and Cheney were members was, of course, chaired by Treasury Secretary Connally until he resigned in 1972. 

During that same era, Anne Armstrong would also ascend from her lowly position as adviser on women’s issues to take a place at the Cost of Living Council, as Rumsfeld advanced to a brief tour at NATO (where he acted as a front man for Henry Kissinger), before serving as President Gerald Ford’s Secretary of Defense after Nixon’s resignation. Connally, Rumsfeld, Cheney and Armstrong—of those four, three would serve as directors of Halliburton. The fourth, Rumsfeld, as Secretary of Defense would help George W. Bush engineer the war in Iraq, to Halliburton’s benefit.

What a small world! 

Who Really Owns Halliburton?

The answer to the Halliburton riddle lies in history. It is a complex tale that takes one through the Indian lands of Oklahoma to California high society; back to the ranches and oilfields of Texas and the skyscrapers of Dallas and Houston. For now, it is the question that is most important—a question the media has yet to ask, much less to answer.

ENDNOTES:

[1] Anne E. Kornblut, “Cheney Shoots Fellow Hunter in Mishap on a Texas Ranch,” The New York Times (February 13, 2006).

[2] Harvey Kronberg in The Quorum Report, quoted in Rick Lyman and Anne E. Korblutt, “The Ranch Where the Politicians Roam,” The New York Times (February 19, 2006).

[3] Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson, “The Washington Merry-Go-Round:  Contractors’ Gift Not Linked to Mohole,” The Washington Post, Times Herald (August 26, 1966), E15.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Kennedy’s resignation may have resulted from the Administration’s embarrassment suffered after the visit of the Rothschild-connected President of France, Georges Pompidou, a few months earlier, as discussed in “Sophistsand Other Scoundrels, Part 1.” 

[7] Joint Meeting of the Empire Club of Canada and The Canadian Club of Toronto (March 19, 1973). Connally, in response to a question raised following his speech (he was asked whether a decision by another nation such as Canada “to conserve its oil, gas, water, mineral and other resources and limit delivery of those to the United States, would … be accepted philosophically by your country … or might we expect political, economic or military pressure to reverse it”), exhibited an attitude of frustration with “nationalism” that has become more prevalent in the years since Connally passed from the scene. He answered as follows: “What you have is yours. You can do with it what you wish; that's your prerogative as a sovereign nation. I would assume that if you are going to deny all your oil, your gas, your water, your timber, your resources, your nickel, your gold or your coal, whatever you have in the way of natural resources, you're going to deny those to the United States in order to conserve them yourselves. I assume that you will equally deny them to other nations around the world.  Under those circumstances I don't know that the United States would have any cause to complain at all.  If, on the other hand, if you denied them only to us and continued to market them and ship them to other nations around the world, I don't know how we could do anything but assume that this was a punitive action taken directly against the United States and then you might hear a little flap about it…. So I think we all have to frankly use our best efforts to put down this increasing wave of nationalism that's sweeping the world.” [italics added]

[8] “International Banking: A Supplement to a Compendium of Papers Prepared for the Fine Study,” Staff Report of the House Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing. 94^th Cong., 2d Sess. (1976). The embedded link allows one to search the article. A search for the word Rothschild brings up nine hits.

[9] Lawrence Malkin, “Rothschild’s Draws on Past to Forge New Global Links, Washington Post, Times Herald (April 6, 1969), 105.

[10] New York Times (November 29, 1972), 64.

Bush and Fay Family Roots and Skeletons

                                                                     

Obadiah Bush and His Brother--
Early Abolitionists and Feminists

Obadiah Newcomb Bush, born in Vermont, fought in the War of 1812 which began when he was 15 years old. After war's end both Obadiah and his brother Henry Bush migrated to Rochester, New York. There Obadiah met and, in 1821, married Harriet Smith, a daughter of Dr. Sanford and Priscilla Whipple Smith. The Bushes’ son, James Smith Bush, was born there in 1825. Obadiah began teaching at Rochester Seminary, a public school, and was shown in 1832 to be one of its trustees (and Treasurer) before it became Rochester Collegiate Institute in 1841. In 1827 Obadiah was a trustee of the Third Presbyterian Church and Society of Rochester.

With a population exceeding 12,000, when the City of Rochester incorporated in 1834, Obadiah was serving as one of the city’s fire wardens. For its 50th anniversary in 1884, the city commissioned Jenny Marsh Parker to write a history of the city, and Obadiah’s name appeared several times in her book. For example, in 1838 he was named as an officer in Rochester’s Anti-Slavery Society. Obadiah had been attending annual meetings of the American Anti-Slavery Society since at least 1835, and would have been acquainted from those meetings with its president Arthur Tappan, with William Lloyd Garrison, and with former slave Frederick Douglass, who became a member later.

The Liberator reported that O.N. Bush was a manager representing New York, along with Gerrit Smith and Beriah Green of Syracuse's Oneida University, of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1839-40. He was elected in the annual meeting in Boston in May 1839. Other New Yorkers elected included William L. Chaplin, Richard P. G. Wright, Beuben Sleeper, Rev. Elon Galusha.

Henry Bush and Abigail Norton Bush

Obadiah's brother, Henry Bush, before settling permanently in Rochester, had gone to Ohio, where two of Henry and Abigail Bush's children were born. They returned to Rochester to set up a stove dealership soon after 1840.  Henry then set up his business and also developed a strong interest in the Western New York Anti-Slavery Society ( WNYASS) formed in 1840 by Chaplin.

Henry Bush's wife Abigail Norton Bush, an intrepid suffragist with Amy Post and Lucretia Mott, presided over the Women’s Rights Convention in Rochester in 1848—the first woman who ever presided over such a meeting in which men were also involved. Once Abigail had taken that shocking step against men’s preordained role of dominance, however, she and her family were soon banned from decent society in Rochester.

According to Nancy A. Hewitt in her book Women's Activism and Social Change: Rochester, New York, 1822-1872 (page 106), Abigail was a member of the group led by Frederick Douglass in Rochester called Western New York Anti-Slavery Society. Also in that group were John Kedzie and Samuel D. Porter. Douglass, the freedman abolitionist, would leave his home in Rochester (bought from John Kedzie) in 1852.


John Kedzie, a silversmith and manufacturer of filters, sometimes worked out of an office in New York City (according to the 1889 City Record) with Dr. George E. Morgan, a physician. Morgan was a son-in-law of James Hall Foote, a hardware wholesaler. In 1850 a daughter was born to Dr. Morgan and his wife, whom they named Lemyra (after John Kedzie's wife). When Lemyra was about ten years old, after continuing to insist she was a boy, was allowed to dress in male clothes and to change her name to Rollin Kedzie Morgan, after her uncle Rollin H. Morgan. John Kedzie also had a son named Rollin Morgan Kedzie.


Shortly after presiding over the women’s convention, the Bush family’s future changed forever:

In 1849 or 1850, after years of suffering business losses, Henry Bush headed west to join the California Gold Rush and to make a life there. He left a pregnant Abigail in Rochester. By the early 1850s, the whole family had settled in California, where Bush was to live for the rest of her life…. Abigail Bush died at Vacaville, California on December 10, 1898 at the age of 88. She is buried with her husband in Alhambra Pioneer Cemetery on a hill across the city from the one on which she had lived for nearly 30 years.

Henry Bush bought land near Martinez, in Contra Costa County, California. There he started a vineyard, which the family sold to Christian Brothers in 1879. The Catholic brothers also began building St. Mary's College at the site. Henry and Abigail had one daughter and four sons, including

Kedzie Morgan in 1954

• Norton Bush, who became a famous landscape artist; and
• David S. Bush, who married Ellen Morgan. Their daughter, Dr. Alice Bush, was engaged for a year to Dr. H. S. Pelton, who froze to death while in Alaska, searching for gold in 1901. Three years later Alice contracted a marriage to her first cousin, Rollin Kedzie Morgan a/k/a R. K. Morgan, a lifelong transsexual, who lived with her for five years. Dr. George E. Morgan, a brother of Alice's mother, had attended Hahneman Medical College in Philadelphia, founded upon principles of homeopathy set up by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann of Germany. Alice Bush was connected with Hahnemann Hospital and medical college in San Francisco, where her cousin Rollin Morgan enrolled.

Obadiah and Henry's younger sister, Caroline Bush, married Joseph Bayard Bloss, whose brother William Clough Bloss, was a manager of the Rochester Anti-Slavery Society in 1834. Joseph Bloss was sympathetic to that movement, but he was even more active in the temperance cause while in New York. The Blosses eventually moved farther west to Michigan where they lived the remainder of their lives.

Obadiah's Descendants

The call of gold

Like his brother Henry, Obadiah Bush also heard the call from the California gold fields almost as soon as discoveries were made at Sutter’s Mill. He left his family behind in Rochester while he was “off panning for gold,” as we are informed by George W. Bush's biographer, Mickey Herskowitz, who gives Obadiah’s absence from Rochester as the reason for his son James’ decision to practice law there instead of becoming a minister. [9]

Obadiah Bush departed for California after the U.S. Census, signed on August 31, 1850, indicated that James Smith Bush, age 24, was indeed practicing law in Rochester while his father, "O.N. Bush," was then a “land agent,” residing at the same residence, along with his mother Harriet and four other siblings. That census records all the children of Obadiah N. and Harriet Smith Bush were then residing with Obadiah and Harriet Bush in Rochester, New York:

1. the eldest son, James, 24, was practicing law in Rochester;
2. daughter Cornelia, 27,  was unmarried;
3. daughter Elizabeth, 19, also unmarried;
4. son William Mack, 14, was in school; and
5. son Sanford, only 6 years of age.

Rev. J.S. Bush

Four months later, Obadiah (O. N. Bush) was living in San Francisco, California. We do not know whether he made contact with his brother Henry there, but he did begin preparing for a permanent life out west. By December he was being elected to the executive committee of the New England Club in San Francisco, a club organized only three months earlier by other easterners. Obadiah remained several more months and was heading home on the Steamer Oregon when he met his death on August 15, 1851, and was buried at sea. This occurred three days after another passenger aboard had been buried in Acapulco.

New York in 1851 when he reportedly died aboard ship near Acapulco, Mexico. He was buried at sea.

James Smith Bush, the eldest son, did not have time to grieve for the loss of his father. In October 1851 he married Sarah Hannah Freeman, daughter of a physician, Dr. Samuel Freeman of Saratoga Springs, New York. Sarah moved with James to Rochester, where she died two years later. By 1855 James was recorded by the 1855 New York state census as a student in Saratoga Springs, living with his in-laws while studying for the ministry. The death of his father, wife, and infant child, had apparently taken their toll on his spiritual well-being, turning him to religious studies. All but one of Sarah's siblings had also predeceased her, leaving behind her parents and a sister, Helen Freeman, who in 1861 married Rev. John Woodbridge, a widower with five children.

The year 1860 was a climactic one, which saw the civil war beginning to split apart the country. But before following up on the second marriage of Rev. Bush and his descendants at that turbulent time, we will next explore his siblings, the other children of Obadiah and Harriet Smith Bush.

Cornelia Bush Marsh
James Smith Bush's eldest sister, Cornelia, had married Robert Marsh and moved to Virginia, where three children were born. From there they moved west to Ohio before the civil war.

William Raymond, coffin maker

Lizzie Bush Raymond

 A second sister, Elizabeth (they called her Lizzie), married William Mead Raymond in 1852, and they lived out most of the remainder of their years in the northernmost part of Brooklyn, New York--called Williamsburg--west of  Newtown Creek southern bend. They moved farther north for a time to Newburgh, Orange County, New York (shown there in census of 1870).

In 1876, a city directory showed the Raymond family back in north Brooklyn at 130 Rodney Street, while the office address for Mead's coffin-making business was at 348 Pearl Street in Manhattan, near the Brooklyn bridge. The family had by then suffered two catastrophic events:

• The eldest son, William Bush Raymond, died at the tender age of 13 in 1867;
• a daughter Evangeline died in 1875 at the age of 11.

One child remained--Jessie, born in 1860. She married in 1883, one year after her father was said to have dropped dead while strolling with his wife in Kensington, London. His widow returned home but eventually relocated to Saratoga Springs.

William Mack Bush

The fourth of the Bush children born (1836) to Obadiah and Harriet was William Mack Bush. Only 15 when his father died in 1851, William attended Harvard and then studied at MIT, obtaining a degree as a civil engineer by 1858. During those years, it seems likely that his mother had moved with him to Massachusetts, since neither of them show up in the New York census of 1855.

In June of 1859 William married Euphemia "Effie" Faulkner, of  Newtown, Long Island (area now absorbed by Brooklyn), who had grown up very close to the Williamburgh neighborhood where Lizzie Bush Raymond lived with her family. It is possible that young William Mack Bush had met his future wife while accompanying their mother to visit his sister in Brooklyn. In the 1860 census, Obadiah's widow (Harriet S. Bush) and the youngest son Sanford were making their home with William Mack and his new bride in Orange Ward 1 in Essex County, New Jersey, some distance away from the manse provided to the newly ordained Episcopal minister, Rev. James S. Bush, Harriet's eldest son.

Mrs. William Mack Bush's Meiggs/Keith Relations

Henry Meiggs

Effie Faulkner Bush had two sisters who had married men from the Meiggs family who had engaged in the lumber business in that same area of Brooklyn:

• Mary Augusta Faulkner in January 1858 married John Gilbert Meiggs, youngest brother of  the once-infamous Henry Meiggs, who heard the call of wealth in California a year or so before Obadiah appeared there. The Meiggs family had been in the lumber business in New York, and Henry saw an opportunity to provide lumber for the booming construction business in that new territory, to which wannabe gold miners were moving.
  After building Meiggs Wharf at San Francisco, Henry Meiggs reportedly absconded in 1854 with proceeds of forged warrants and stock from his lumber company, bound with his family for Tahiti. With him was his younger brother, John Gilbert Meiggs, and other family members. He eventually turned up in Chile (which had no extradition treaty with the United States), where he obtained a concession from its president to construct a railroad from Valparaiso to Santiago, which was completed ahead of schedule in 1860. History then revised his notoriety, once he paid back the money which he had stolen.

• Elizabeth (Lillie) Faulkner in 1838 married Henry Meiggs Keith, a nephew of her brother-in-law. One of the sons of Emily Meiggs Keith and Minor Hubbell Keith, and brother of the much more famous Minor Cooper Keith.

Minor Cooper Keith in Costa Rica

In 1871 Henry Meiggs summoned his sister's sons to join him in new railroad projects in Peru and Costa Rica where Effie Bush's brother-in-law, John Gilbert Meiggs, had been working for some time. It was a dangerous project in which several of the Meiggs and Keith men would die, including Effie's brother-in-law Henry Keith, whose brother--Minor Cooper Keith--then became Henry Meiggs' protege, and ultimately, founder of the United Fruit Company.

Upon Uncle Henry Meiggs's death in 1877, his will, published in the New York Daily Herald, did not mention his brother, John G. Meiggs, who had sailed from Callao, Peru, and arrived in Liverpool in February, 1876, intent on borrowing money on behalf of the Peruvian government, presumably for his brother's projects. His wife, Effie's sister, traveled with him, and she gave birth on January 6, 1877 to Norah Church Meiggs in London. (Note: When Norah married Herbert Allfrey 20 years later, Ambassador John Hay and the Cunard family attended her wedding.)

A portion of the will, relating to unfinished South American projects, appeared in the news in October 1877:

 He named William Mack Bush first among a group of men from whom successors would be chosen in the event any of his named executors failed to serve in that capacity. William's wife, the former Effie Faulkner, had given birth in Peru to several children between 1871 and 1876.

John G. Means established a banking and contracting business of his own--John G. Meiggs, Son & Co.--based in London, where the family lived from then on, becoming naturalized British citizens.
Mary Faulkner Meiggs's youngest child, Hilda Rathbone Meiggs, would be born in 1882, while the family lived in South Kensington, shown by the 1881 census at Bailey's Hotel (140 Gloucester Road, London SW7 4QH). In 1901 Hilda (18) was living with her 75-year-old widowed father in Chelsea, cared for by her older unmarried sister, Mary Effie Meiggs.

Later years would show Mary Effie and her brother Frank, neither of whom married, living at Birch Trees in Haslemere, in West Sussex. A Sister, Helen Cornell "Nina" Meiggs, had in 1890 married Sir James Roderick Duff McGrigor.

In 1879, Keith had begun growing bananas on lands in Costa Rica, which product he eventually transported to market by means of a his own shipping line.

At some point after this change, there was no need for William Bush to remain in London. When he returned to America, he settled with his family in Concord, Massachusetts, where they lived in 1893 at Nashawtuc Hill near Elm Street until closing their house in November 1894 to move to Brooklyn.

There are several extant homes in that area built around 1884 and are quite impressive.

The later years of the Keith family are shown below.






The Fay Family in Concord

Harriet's father, Samuel H. Fay, as a young man had moved to Savannah, Georgia to work as a cotton broker. It is possible he met Harriet's mother, Susan Shellman, through her father, whose family in 1807 had built a boarding house in Savannah, which they advertised in New York papers. Between 1828 and 1834, John Shellman received a presidential appointment to be inspector and surveyor at the Port of Savannah, and return revenues collected to the U.S. Government. However, an inquiry was made in 1855, questioning whether his debt owed to the government in 1831 had ever been resolved. Shellman died in 1838.

Susan Shellman had been seventeen in 1825, when she married 21-year-old Sam Fay, recently arrived from Massachusetts. We are given very little about Sam's biography, other than what we have to glean by reference from that of his younger brother, Joseph Story Fay:

As a young man, he [Joseph] worked as a shipping agent in New York in partnership with L. H. Brigham. In 1838, he moved to Savannah, Ga. and joined his brother Samuel H. Fay in the cotton trade as part of the firm Padelford, Fay & Co. He worked in that business until 1861, when the company dissolved and he moved back to Massachusetts.

The partnership was with Edward Nathaniel Packard Padelford, who died in Savannah in 1870. Padelford appointed Joseph Story Fay to act with his son-in-law, Francis C. Foster, to manage property bequeathed to his daughter.

The census of 1850 records that Joseph Fay was living in Chatham County, Georgia, and for a time served as president of Chatham Academy, as well as the Union Society. Both Joseph Story Fay and his brother Samuel Fay had seemingly moved to Savannah as early as 1825, the year he married Susan Shellman.

We know that in 1894 William M. Bush was residing in Concord since his son Robert married Marguerite Putnam of Dorchester in a wedding ceremony performed by the rector of Trinity Episcopal Church in Concord. Trinity, only a decade old at the time, had a late start due to Concord's retaining its patriotic fervor long after the British soldiers, and their state religion, had been eradicated during the revolution.

James Smith Bush resigned from his pastorate at Staten Island in late 1884 and immediately thereafter relocated to his wife's hometown of Concord, Massachusetts for several years, working as superintendent of schools in Concord before 1887 and resigning in April 1877. His brother, William M. Bush, was also living in Concord at that time. James and Harriet Bush's youngest son, Harold, prepped for college in Concord before he began his engineering studies at Cornell (Class of 1893). His parents also  moved to Ithaca, NY, shortly before Rev. Bush's death in 1889.

Rev. Bush's widow, Harriet Fay Bush, was found in 1900 census records to be living in  Concord, Massachusetts with her daughter, Eleanor Howard Bush (born 1873), an 1896 graduate of Smith College. She then trained to be a settlement worker at Boston Associated Charities, whose president was Robert Treat Paine, a descendant of the signer of the Declaration of Independence with the same name. Eleanor, in 1902, married Robert Archey Woods, founder of Boston's first settlement house, South End. When R. T. Paine died in 1910, Woods wrote a lengthy notice of his death, published in the Boston Transcript.

Harold M. Bush, Cornell Class of 1893

Eleanor and her mother had moved to Columbus, Ohio, where Harriet's unmarried son Harold (a soldier in Ohio's Light Battery H), resided as early as 1896, according to his service record and city directories. Harold had been a student at Cornell in Ithaca when his father died there in 1889, and he graduated in 1893, with a degree in mechanical engineering. His work history appears in updates he furnished to Cornell.


The Fay brothers in the South

Harriet's father - suicide?

Harriet Fay Bush, was a young girl in 1847 when her father--Samuel Howard Fay-- died. Her grandfather was an eminent judge in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Samuel Prescott Phillips Fay, who had been born in Concord, Massachusetts, in 1778.

He went to Savannah, Georgia, early in his career as a cotton broker, and there he met and married Susan Shellman. The births of several children followed. Samuel Fay executed his will in Savannah in 1839 before he relocated to Brooklyn, after the birth of Susan Elliott Fay in 1843. The child's name may signify a closeness between Fay and Georgia's first Episcopal Bishop Stephen Elliott, who was at that time organizing a school in the diocese, to which S. H. Fay was named as principal. The school's largest donor was Gazaway Bugg Lamar.

Not long after becoming the school principal, the Bishop and financial angel of the female school paid Fay a visit in early May 1845, only a few months after the Bishop had been involved in the trial of a fellow bishop, Onderdonk of Pennsylvania. Elliott had no tolerance for men of authority allegedly engaged in improprieties with female members.

Two months after the allegations of improprieties appeared against Fay, on July 10, 1845, Susan Fay gave birth to Clara Montford Fay in Cambridge, Massachusetts, presumably under the guidance of her in-laws. Shortly thereafter Samuel was dispatched with his family to Brooklyn, New York.

Probate proceedings filed in May 1847 declared that Samuel had died on April 17, evidence of which was cited as a letter written in his own hand. However, no body had been located at that time. Notices of his disappearance were posted and a reward offered for information. Fay was said to have been involved in "adventurous transactions," which he did not expect to turn out well. A search of records in the Ancestry.com database indicates Letters Testamentary were issued in June of 1847 (recorded 2/168). The summer had passed before a decomposed body turned up in the dried-up bed of a pond in Flatbush--a signet ring belonging to Fay and identifying papers found in the jacket pocket. An empty vial of poison was also found nearby.

By the 1850 census Susan Fay had moved with all five children (Harriet was then 20, her elder sister 22) to New Haven, Connecticut, but their address was some distance from the Yale campus, east of the river. In the meantime, Samuel's brother (Joseph Story Fay) had taken up the cotton business in Savannah, as indicated in the 1850 census and tax records in Georgia.

The 1855 New York census showed Susan living in Manhattan with three servants to care for the family (Anna and Harriet were 27 and 25, respectively). Anna, who never married, died in 1921 at the age of 92 while living with her unmarried niece, Rosamond Hill-Smith, only daughter of Clara Fay Hill Smith.

Susan's own will, written in 1884, would leave her daughter, Harriet E. Bush, a fourth of her estate, with a like amount to Harriet's brother, Joseph Story Fay.

Minor Cooper Keith and United Fruit

The contracts continued with Minor Cooper Keith in charge in Costa Rica. He married the Costa Rican president's daughter and eventually brought her to Brooklyn and built her a mansion at West Islip on the south shore of Long Island. The Associated Press wrote about him at the time of his death the following:

He had received an invitation from his brother, Henry Meiggs Keith, to join him in the construction of a railroad in Costa Rica, so he joined his brother in that country, at that time a fever-ridden jungle, and the two men began to build a line from Puerto Limon, on the Atlantic side, to San Jose, the capital, on the Pacific.  Henry Meiggs, an uncle and a builder of the first railroad across the Andes, had turned over to Mr. Keith's brother the contract for this road.

At the start the enterprise was beset with grave peril and in the first twenty-five miles Mr. Keith's three brothers and 4,000 other men lost their lives.  Despite this, Mr. Keith, on his own credit, continued for several years to build the line, contracting in 1882 with the government to arrange the external debt and to complete the road to San Jose.  He went to live in London for three years, where he arranged the external debt and also the financing of £1,200,000 in bonds to finish the railway.  While building the road on his own credit he suffered losses of more than $1,000,000 which the Costa Rican government paid to him voluntarily.

His obituary in the New York Times in 1929 stated:

Meanwhile Mr. Keith saw the possibilities of banana raising in Costa Rica and in  1872 he started a plantation-the first in Central America--shipping to New Orleans and New York.  He gradually extended his plantations until he became, in 1898, the largest banana grower in Central America.  He also in the meantime had acquired a fleet of steamships to transport his fruit.

In 1899 he organized the United Fruit Company with the late Andrew W. Preston, receiving three-fifths of the company's capital for his interests.  He was the first vice president of the corporation's steamship line which office he resigned many years ago to attend to his widening interests.

In 1912 he organized the Guatemalan Railways, which became the International Railways of Central America, a system of some 880 miles, touching both the Pacific Coast and the Caribbean.  He also became president of the Guatemala & Salvador Railway, the St. Andrew's Bay Lumber Company, the Abangarez Gold Fields of Costa Rica and the Polochic Banana Company.  He was vice-president of the Premier Gold Mining Company of this city, International Products Corporation and the General Lead Batteries Company.

In 1883 Mr. Keith married Cristina Castro, daughter of Jose M. Castro, former President of the Republic of Costa Rica, by whom he is survived.

Henry Meiggs' youngest brother, John Gilbert Meiggs and his wife, formerly Mary Augusta Faulkner, moved to London  in 1877 to raise funds for the construction projects that were continued by the the Keith brothers. Mary Faulkner Meiggs was the sister of Effie Bush, wife of William Mack Bush--James Smith Bush's younger brother. The Meiggses remained in South Kensington for many years, even after the births in 1877 and 1882 of their youngest daughters, Norah Church (Mrs Herbert C. Allfrey) and Hilda R. Meiggs (Mrs. Edward Arthur Smalley Potter). Both girls grew up in London and married wealthy Englishmen.

O. H. Bush's widow, Harriet Smith Bush, the mother of James Smith and William Mack Bush, also moved to Orange, New Jersey, with her youngest son — fifteen-year-old Sanford — where they lived in the residence of  24-year-old William Mack Bush, according to the 1860 census. William's occupation at that time was bookkeeper. William's brother-in-law, Henry Meiggs Keith, enticed him, as well as Henry's own brother, Minor Cooper Keith, to work in South America, building railroads for his uncle. At some point after 1867, when William's third son was born, he moved his family to Lima, Peru. The1900 census shows their children as follows:

Wm. F. Bush

• William Faulkner Bush, born at Newtown, Long Island, New York in 1861; married in Flushing, N.Y., 1887 to Marion Smedberg; a 1921 passport application showed his legal domicile at Roselle Park, N.J., residence at Paysandu, Uruguay, and working for Midland Uruguay Railway Co., Ltd., based in Maiden Head, England.
• James Sanford Bush, born in New York in 1864; married Helen Stetson and worked initially for M. Farris & Co. as a custom house merchant.
• Robert Marsh Bush, born in New York in 1867, married Marguerite Putnam in Concord, Massachusetts, in 1894; her father, Silas S. Putnam, had made curtain rods and hooks, expanding into horseshoe nails, at two large facilities, located on Ericsson Street and on Neponset Avenue. He invented all the products he made and retired from the New Era Coffee company (patented in 1877 as a  substitute for coffee) just before his daughter's marriage. The "coffee" was made from wheat and was manufactured on the Neponset River until at least 1938. Robert and Marguerite Bush lived at 722 Walnut Street, Roselle Park, New Jersey--just west of Staten Island. He worked at C. B. Richard & Co. at 61 Broadway in New York City, steamship agents, as an insurance broker.
• Their only daughter, Alice E. Bush, was born in 1871 in Peru and never married;
• Walter Meiggs Bush, born in Peru in 1873; in 1920 worked for Baltimore Tube Co., originally organized by Minor Cooper Keith, who also founded the Baltimore Bridge Company of which Harry Dean Bush was manager.
• Noel Mack Bush, was also born in Peru in 1876. He eventually married Anne Rainsford French in Concord, Massachusetts

 In World War I the Meiggs banana distribution network, which had taken the name United Fruit Company, would have a large role with the U.S. Navy by lending ships to America. The Bush family would also have many unexplained connections to the Navy through George H. W. Bush and his son George W. Bush--both of whom became Presidents. That story is saved for later.

Skull and Bones Accepted Hegel's Dialectic Theories

Freedom Through Order

The philosophy which has dominated the Western world since the mid 19^th Century can be reduced to one tenet—ultimate peace comes only through conflict—derived from Hegel’s dialectic teachings.  It proposes that a clash between ideologies (thesis and antithesis) is a normal historical phenomenon which always results in compromise (synthesis) that advances civilization to a higher level of order.  Conflict, in other words, is good, and peace is not necessarily desirable (or profitable).[1]

Educated men had founded governments after a period of violence and chaos, a state that would return unless members of society advanced to a higher level—acceptance of a need to abide by voluntary rules of law and order.  Once most individuals accepted the “truth” that an ordered life brings greater peace, leaders could then frame institutions by which non-conformists could be forced into their “proper role” in a peaceful society.  

This philosophy, which had risen to increasing prominence by 1860, appealed to elitist Americans studying in German universities during those decades.  Recognizing a German need at the time to unify the nation state, Hegel’s writing also looked forward to a day of universal—global—brotherhood accomplished by rejecting selfish individualism.  Repelled by the chaos of the French Revolution, Hegel taught that political democracy and individualism ultimately resulted in repression rather than liberty and that an orderly and structured society afforded more freedom than a chaotic one.  

American students in Germany who were most attracted to this philosophy believed that Western classical liberal thought upon which America had been founded, rather than being the ideal toward which America should strive, was actually the enemy of progress toward universal brotherhood. Moreover, one of those students, William HuntingtonRussell, whose family had made a fortune by selling opium in China, returned to Yale in 1832 to found a branch of a German secret society at Yale with fellow student Alphonso Taft.[2] It is this secret society, now called Skull and Bones, into which both John Kerry and George W. Bush were inducted during their junior year at Yale.

Hegel’s German idealism (categorized as such because it stressed the dominance of ideas over physical environment) would become the philosophical basis for the work of both Karl Marx  and Adolph Hitler—each of whom envisioned different ends to be achieved by the same means—control over the individual by the state. This paradox—that Hegel’s theories were used as the foundation of the Bolshevik revolution of 1917, while at the same time giving a basis to the fascist movement of the 1930’s—is not so extraordinary when we realize that, as AntonySutton’s research reveals, both extreme economic doctrines were financed by the same small group of Americans, at the core of which were members of the secret society that had previously been founded by Russell and Taft.[3]  This group became clustered around the Peabody and Morgan banking institutions.

One facet of dialectics was its philosophical justification for simultaneously supporting two opposite positions on a political issue, thus allowing its members to make a profit no matter which party was in power. Talk about hedging bets!  Skull and Bones was set up as a secret fraternity of men from elite social strata within the fields of education, religion, medicine, law, science, transportation, banking and the arts.  There was a place for opposing points of view within their scheme, as long as each man agreed to maintain the established class order and took an oath to keep everything related to Bones secret.  In this way, regardless of whether political power was in the right hand or the left, depending on which way the political pendulum was swinging, power would be in the skeletal hand of Yale’s elite Skull and Bones.

Pool of Wealth—a Goose That Lays Golden Eggs

In 1832, the year the first Skull and Bones class was initiated, America was not unlike Hegel’s Germany.  A generation after the War of 1812 the U. S. Constitution was still less than a half century old and the new nation more divided than ever. The failure of the Second Bank of the U.S. in 1832 left state chartered banks free to issue their own bank notes, which could be traded as currency—resulting in financial chaos leading to the Panic of 1837. Consequently, a uniform currency, a stable rate of exchange, and a secondary market for securities had to be created in order for the American economy to have liquidity. The National Currency Act of 1863 and National Bank Act of 1864 helped to achieve these needs, replacing state chartered banks with national ones, though it would be alleged after numerous panics—in 1873, 1893 and 1907—that there was a need for a centralized control in order to expand and contract the currency when needed. 

By 1878, once the country had recovered from the 1873 panic caused by the failure of Jay Cooke’s bank, New York City had replaced London as the dominant financial center for United States capital.  American businessmen were primed to get rich. Skull and Bones members decided their time had come to consolidate the power their founders had envisioned. 

What Russell and Taft envisioned by creating the Russell Trust was a network of men who could use surplus wealth (“golden eggs”) produced from the lucrative China Trade as a venture capital pool to acquire equity in business entities to be created by American entrepreneurs. The pool could be repaid with interest while helping the entrepreneurs become rich, with new pools of wealth springing up to seed new ventures. Each new pool of money is like a goose which lays golden eggs.

The idea was that Bonesmen would quickly advance to the top of their chosen profession in order to accumulate an endowment of surplus for investment, to be managed by fellow Bonesmen. As pointed out by Antony Sutton, Bonesmen, such as Daniel Coit Gilman and Andrew Dickson White, founded Johns Hopkins University and Cornell, respectively.  Similarly, those who chose careers in  religion, medicine, law, science, transportation, banking and the arts also controlled trust funds or handled large pools of money, which added to a huge pool ultimately managed by the same bank establishment, headed—until his death in 1913—by J. Pierpont Morgan.

NOTES:

[1] Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831),  a German professor at the University of Berlin from 1817 until his death in 1831, deduced from his study of European history that mankind had made a transition from a natural life of savagery to a state of order and law.  Hegel asserted, “What is rational exists, and what exists is rational.” Following from that, events of history are not accidents, but instead, manifestations of the universal divine idea. While human conditions continuously change, Hegel believed, each change moves the world closer to the universal goal of history: the achievement of human freedom. Thus, history is the story of the progress of humanity toward true freedom.  Hegel explained the ongoing, progressive path of history through his “law of the Dialectic”.  “According to Hegel, every age is governed by a dominant idea, which he labels the spirit or the "thesis" of the age. In time, this thesis is challenged by a new concept, its ‘antithesis,’ which is incompatible with the "thesis." To resolve the conflict between the ‘thesis’ and the ‘antithesis,’ a blending of opposites occurs, thereby producing a higher ‘synthesis,’ which becomes the new dominant idea, or thesis, of the next age. History consists of the constant flow of ideas and their opposites, which when reconciled, reach purer forms. The new synthesis does not come without strife, but conflicts, commonly regarded as tragedies, to Hegel do not demonstrate the triumph of evil. They are necessary steps forward toward the universal goal, human freedom. To Hegel, however, the highest form of freedom was not the absence of self-restraint, for the true ethical unit was not the isolated individual but the state in which the individual lives. Consequently, the movement of history is not toward individual freedom but toward the freedom of the community as a whole. Therefore, Hegel's philosophy exalts the state because only through it can humankind find meaning and be truly free.”  Quoted in “Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,”  World Eras, Vol. 9: Industrial Revolution in Europe (1750-1914). Gale Group, 2002.

[2] After his graduation from Yale, Russell would found a prepatory academy in New Haven called the New Haven Collegiate Institute with Stiles French, which later became the Russell Military Academy. 

[3] WALL STREET AND THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION and WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER (1974 Arlington House; 1999 Buccaneer Books).